Hail,
First off, here is a description (slightly edited) of baby centaurs at play. It is from a work called Images by Philostratus the Elder, and it is either, as he says, him describing a painting of some centaurs at play or, as seems to me much more likely, him recording his impressions of actual real live centaurs which it turns out, really did exist and were wonderful and beautiful and completely awesome!!!!!
Anyhow.
Here it is:
"Of the baby Kentauroi, some lie wrapped in swaddling clothes and some have discarded them. Some seem to be crying, some are happy and smile as they suck at their mother's breasts. Some play beneath while their mothers stand, while others cling to them when the mothers kneel down. One is throwing a stone at his mother - already he is naughty!
The bodies of the infants have not yet taken on their definite shape, because they are still being breastfed, but some older ones are already leaping about, and show a little shagginess, and have sprouted mane and hoofs, though these are still tender. How beautiful they are!
The human bodies of some of the Kentauroi grow out of white mares. Others sprout from chestnut mares, or black, or dappled, but they all glisten like those of horses that are well cared for. Sometimes a very white-skinned female centaur will have the body of a black mare - the opposition of the colours in one creature is what makes the whole so beautiful. They have a most delightful home in the valleys of Mount Pelion."
Three paragraphs and since then I've been ceaselessly turning over ideas in my mind, trying to get centaurs into my novel.
Actual real reconstruction of unicorn by real scientist
What else?
Some of my friends, the SF author ones, were expressing their concerns about how few people working in the field seem to have read the SF Classics. The overall - although there was some dissent - view was that this was a bad thing. My feelings on this are that if this is happening - and I am not sure if it is - it might be something to be celebrated, as much as mourned.
Cave of unicorn, where above irrefutable skeleton was found. In German, this is the Einkornhohle.
For a start, none of us have the time to read all the classics. I know, because I tried to do just that. Over a period of about ten years I read - I am not joking - every Penguin Classic published between the dawn of writing and about 1750, maybe 1700, but sporadically from after that as well. Every single one. It cost time and money and health and probably a lot of sanity points I couldn't really afford. I read the Bacchantes and the Guides to Greece and the Revelation of Divine Love and Collected Hindu Myths and City of God and the first Spanish records of the New World and The Critique of Pure Reason and I reckon I started to falter around there because have you seen it it's a freaking monstrous book I mean it is actually physically draining to read and thank God they don't do a hardback series or I would have ended up with arms like a fiddler crab and then I got to Hegel or Fuerbach or someone and drifted into theology and I gave up.
A few things I learnt.
1. Short books - the Prince, the Dao De Jing, the Epic of Gilgamesh - say as much as very long books. Max Weber could have written The Protestant Work Ethic in, say, a few percent of what he took. It could have been a book you put in your pocket, rather than something you need a heavy vehicle licence to approach.
1.5 Even the best write crap on occasion. If you don't believe me, read Byron, who wrote the best "I am thirteen and girls don't understand me" poetry of all time. No, all of it. Every single frickin poem. I'll be here. Waiting for you to apologise.
2. Reading stuff by people you don't know and don't understand and maybe don't even like is important and wonderful and worthwhile.
3. There are startling, startling things out there and we are lucky to be alive.
Centaurs had complex anatomies, with a cartilaginous upper thoracic spine that meant their heads and bodies flopped about whenever they tried to stab someone. This is why they died out.
4. Some books don't really help some people. Charles Dickens, for example. It may have been me, I am sure it was, and maybe I'll try again later, but I wanted everyone in Oliver Twist dead.
5. Shakespeare is actually under-rated. We should end the separation of Church and State and make bardolatry compulsory, with shunnings and stonings and stuff. Seriously, read a few pages of Love's Labours Lost and marvel.
6. Or watch it instead. Some books aren't meant to be read. The Michael Alexander version of Beowulf works best declaimed on a rocky seashore or gathered around a fire - I have done both of these and they rock. Shakespeare and Marlowe can be watched or read. Dickens can be fried or fricasseed.
7. Don't try to do this yourself - read all the books - because it is impossible. After the Age of Enlightenment literacy went viral and you can't read all the the things.
Occasional monstrous throwbacks to Homo equus occur, but they are shunned by society.
Or forced into marginalised occupations such as sex work.
Turns out reading some stuff written in the last two centuries is important. Like, apparently a glorious socialist future awaits us all. Who knew?
Anyhow - SF Classics. I don't know. I don't know that (takes a deep breath) reading, say, Asimov is a good idea anymore. I don't think it is. I don't know that reading Asimov makes you a better writer, more able to evoke feeling, more able to conjure images, more able to surprise, because many people I know already are better writers than Asimov. I can easily name ten. Seriously.
I don't know that we should read Asimov's stuff so that Asimov's ideas get more airtime because, to be honest, we had a whole decade or three or four, everything before the New Wave, where it was a lot of that white man science triumphant kind of stuff, and I don't know that the rise of Moorcock and Dick and the others made things worse for us.
Anyhow - SF Classics. I don't know. I don't know that (takes a deep breath) reading, say, Asimov is a good idea anymore. I don't think it is. I don't know that reading Asimov makes you a better writer, more able to evoke feeling, more able to conjure images, more able to surprise, because many people I know already are better writers than Asimov. I can easily name ten. Seriously.
I don't know that we should read Asimov's stuff so that Asimov's ideas get more airtime because, to be honest, we had a whole decade or three or four, everything before the New Wave, where it was a lot of that white man science triumphant kind of stuff, and I don't know that the rise of Moorcock and Dick and the others made things worse for us.
There were a lot of stories we didn't tell and haven't told, and can and must and need to be told, and going back to Asimov isn't going to tell us them.
Here is what I am talking about. It's a paragraph from The Stone Gods, by Jeanette Winterson. Read this:
There's a planet they call Medusa. It's made of rock, alright, but the rock has sharded and split so many times that there's nothing solid - just strands of rock splintered out from the surface like thick plaits of hair. Like snakes. When the sky-winds blow, the rock-strands move, and something about the wind through them makes them sing. Its as if a head is turned away from you, always turned away, and singing through the darkness, dark and lonely, never see her face.
When I read that I was transfixed. Three days and I still don't know how to talk about it. Writing that stops your breath.
Anyhow - read widely. Read good, read hard, read frustrating stuff. Read weird and strange, it's what we feed on. Read magical and mysterious. Read new, for God's sake, above all else read new. Read vivid and morbid and odd. Know that the other stuff is out there, and read it if you like - because that's the most important thing, read with fervour and hunger and need - but truth be told, there wouldn't be ten Truly Essential Classics in SF and maybe you don't have to do more than that.
Anyhow. My opinion. Your mileage, or warpage, or parsecage, or whatever, may vary.
Thanks for listening.
Brendan






























